Fleet Leader Interview with Paul Strobis of the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority
The Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA) provides paratransit service to sixty towns and cities in and around Boston. With over 800 vehicles, the MBTA completes more than 1.9 million trips each year. Their paratransit service, called THE RIDE, is contracted to three companies: Greater Lynn Senior Services, Joint Venture TTI/YCN and Veterans Transportation Services. Paul Strobis, Assistant Manager, Paratransit Contract Operations for the MBTA talks about the benefits ITS technology has brought to their operation.
1. What does your company look for in a technology provider? What do you value most?
When we went looking for technology partners for our next five year service contract we wanted to look for stability and the best value for the MBTA, especially in the current economic climate. And with that stability and value, we wanted to be able to provide quality service to the disabled community which is our customer base.
2. How has the system improved how dispatchers interact with drivers?
I think it’s reduced the amount of radio traffic. One-on-one messaging capabilities with the drivers mean that messages don’t need to be broadcast fleet-wide. Using the mobile computers, dispatchers can communicate directly with a driver for same-day orders or manifest changes. I think that’s been the biggest difference.
3. Has the system helped you to more effectively monitor the on-time performance of your fleet?
The information we get back from the AVL technology absolutely gives me a solid feeling about our on-time performance data. Previous to this system, the reporting was being done manually and the MBTA had to take at face value that what was being reported was accurate. Now it’s all uniform, accurate reporting.
This system gives us data so we know when we’re arriving, when we’ve departed, and when we arrive at the drop-off location. All of that data can be collected and reported on, which allows us to see where the problems are. Our scheduling folks can assess this data and are able to tweak the schedule and improve it.
4. Where are you seeing the most benefit?
We are seeing the most benefit in the accuracy of reporting and improved customer service by being able to tell the customer where the vehicle is instead of guessing. I would imagine that fleet utilization and driver utilization is more beneficial to the vendors, as they can keep their man power down by accurately knowing what their slack time is, where their holes are in the schedule, and by being able to dispatch on-the-fly versus sending out paper manifests.
5. At this stage in your company’s growth, what would have been the impact of not equipping your operation with this new technology? How would your customers/staff have been affected?
If we didn’t have this ITS system I would imagine chaos, so I don’t think about that. We’d probably need to hire more staff to be able to handle what is now mostly automated.
Prior to this ITS infrastructure, we used an old Windows 98-based product. We did have an AVL system but it was spotty at best and all the reporting had to be done manually. When we implemented the new ITS technology we saw a swing in reporting where some of our percentages really skewed in the first fiscal year because it was based on the AVL technology and the data coming out of the system versus manual reporting.
The improvement in customer service has been huge. Instead of getting the old ‘Where’s my ride, oh it’s five minutes away, ten minutes away, right around the corner’. Now it’s ‘Your vehicle’s on Smith Street, three minutes away ETA’. Because we really do know where the vehicle is today.
